William Utermohlen

William Charles Utermohlen (December 5, 1933 – March 21, 2007 (1933-12-05 2007-03-21)) was an American figurative artist who became known posthumously for his self-portraits created after his diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in 1995. Although his career lasted from 1957 to 2001, it is his later works that are most acclaimed.

William Utermohlen
Self-portrait, mixed media on paper, 1967
Born(1933-12-05)December 5, 1933
DiedMarch 21, 2007(2007-03-21) (aged 73)
London, England
NationalityAmerican (1933–1992)
British (1992–2007)
EducationPhiladelphia Academy of Fine Arts
Years active1957–2002
Known forDrawing self-portraits after his diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease
Spouse(s)
Patricia Redmond
(m. 1965)
[lower-alpha 1]
Signature

Born to first-generation German immigrants in South Philadelphia, Utermohlen earned a scholarship at the Philadelphia Academy of Fine Arts (PAFA) in 1951. After completing his military service, he studied in Western Europe in 1953. While studying there, he gained inspiration from Renaissance and Baroque artists; graduating from PAFA in 1957. He moved to London in 1962 and married art historian Patricia Redmond in 1965. He relocated to Massachusetts in 1972 to take a position an art teacher at Amherst College, before returning to London in 1975.

In 1991, Utermohlen began experiencing memory loss. After being diagnosed with AD in 1995, he began a series of self-portraits which lasted until 2001. The portaits were influenced by Francis Bacon and the German Expressionism movement, but have also been compared to artists like Mervyn Peake. He died on March 21, 2007 at the age of 73. In the years after the publication of his works in The Lancet in 2001, Utermohlen's self-portraits have been displayed in several exhibitions, such as the Loyola University Museum of Art in Chicago, and at the Two 10 Gallery London. His self-portraits were the inspiration for the 2019 short film Mémorable.

Early life and career

William Charles Utermohlen was born on December 5, 1933,[1][2] in Southern Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the only child of first-generation German immigrants.[3] He earned a scholarship at the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts (PAFA) in 1951, where he was educated by realist artist Walter Stuempfig.[4] Utermohlen completed his military service in 1953,[5] which included two years in the Caribbean. Shortly after completing military service, he studied in Western Europe and travelled through Italy, France, and Spain[lower-alpha 2] where he was heavily influenced by the works of Giotto and Nicolas Poussin.[7] In 1957, he graduated from PAFA.[8]

From 1957 to 1959, Utermohlen enrolled at the Ruskin School of Art in Oxford, where he met R. B. Kitaj.[9][lower-alpha 3] After leaving Ruskin, Utermohlen returned to the U.S. and stayed there for three years.[11] He then moved to London in 1962, where he met art historian Patricia Redmond, whom he married in 1965.[12][lower-alpha 1] In 1969, Utermohlen's artwork was featured in an exhibition at the Marlborough Gallery.[14] In 1972, Utermohlen began teaching art at the Amherst College in Massachusetts,[15][lower-alpha 4] where Patricia received her master's degree.[17] By 1975, Utermohlen returned to London, earning British nationality in 1992.[18][19]

His early works are mostly figurative;[20] although James M. Stubenrauch described the as also with an "exuberant, at times surrealistic, expressionism."[21] For a period in the late 1970s, as a response to the photorealist movement, he printed photographs onto a canvas and painting directly over the photograph. An example of this technique can be seen in Self-Portrait (Split) (1977). He would employ this technique for two portraits of Redmond.[22] Most of his early paintings are grouped into six cycles: Mythological (1962–1963), Cantos (or Dante) (1964–1966), Mummers (1969–1970), War (1972–1973), Nudes (1973–1974),[lower-alpha 5] and Conversation (1989–1991).[24]

The Schizmatics (Canto XXVIII), which was created in 1996, is one of the paintings in Utermohlen's Cantos series.

The Mythological series are mainly water scenes.[25] The Dante cycle was inspired by Dante's Inferno, while the art style paintings drew influence from pop art.[26] The War series references the Vietnam War;[27] and according to Redmond the inclusion of isolated soldiers represented his feelings of being an outsider in the art scene.[28] Both Mummers and Conversations were based on early memories; the former, completed between 1968 to 1970, is based on the Mummers Parade of Philadelphia.[29] In a letter from November 1970, Utermohlen stated that the cycle was also created as a "vehicle for expressing my anxiety".[30] Redmond said that Mummers was "an empathetic vision of the lower classes, but also his own projected self-image".[28] Polini states that the cycle also had elements of war, alongside the cycles Dante and War.[31]

The Conversation series was described by French psychoanalyst Patrice Polini as Utermohlen trying to establish the events of his life before they fade away.[32] The paintings have been considered a prelude to his diagnosis, representing of a number of symptoms.[33] Titles such as W9 and Maida Vale reference the names of the district and neighborhood, respectively, that he lived in at the time.[34] The artworks themselves contain more saturated colours and "engaging spacial arrangements", which highlight the actions of the people in the artworks.[35] Utermohlen's art dealer Chris Boicos wrote that, in Conversation, "[s]igns of the disease are made apparent in the shifting perceptions of space, objects and people."[36]

Alzheimer's disease

Head I (2000), Utermohlen's last recognizable self-portrait. According to his wife Patricia, these paintings show his "efforts to explain his altered self, his fears and his sadness."[37]

In 1994, he was commissioned by a client to create a family portrait. After around a year, Patricia took the client to Utermohlen's studio to check the progress, where they noticed that the portrait had not changed in nine months.[38] Patricia, believing Utermohlen was depressed, sought medical advice.[39] He was diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease in August 1995, at the age of 61.[40][41][lower-alpha 6] He was sent to the Queen's Square Hospital where a nurse, Ron Isaacs, became interested in his drawings and asked him to start drawing self-portraits.[43] The first of these, Blue Skies,[lower-alpha 7] is a self-portrait of Utermohlen gripping a yellow table, in an interior that The Wall Street Journal described as "an empty studio".[7] When neuropsychologist Sebastian Crutch visited Utermohlen in late 1999, he described this painting as representative of him trying to hang on and avoid being swept out of the open window above.[45] Polini likened the depiction of him holding onto the table to a painter holding onto his canvas, saying that "[i]n order to survive, he must be able to capture this catastrophic moment; he must depict the unspeakable."[46] Blue Skies was also Utermohlen's last painting to be considered "large scale".[47] Created the same year, the sketch A Welcoming Man shows a disassembled figure, representing the loss of spatial perception.[48]

During his work on the Conversation series, Utermohlen began to experience memory loss and an inability to remember recent events, and eventually found himself unable to navigate the route to his apartment or how to tie his necktie.[49] Between 1993 and 1994, Utermohlen created a series of lithographs depicting short stories written by World War I poet Wilfred Owen.[50] The figures were more mask-like than in the Conversation pieces. The artworks, which show a collection of disoriented and wounded soldiers,[51] were described by Chris Boicos, his art dealer, as a metaphor for the forthcoming Alzheimer's disease diagnosis a year later.[52] By the time Utermohlen finished the lithographs, he would often forget to show up for teaching appointments.[53]

He began series of self-portraits after his diagnosis in 1995.[54] The earliest of these, the Masks series, are in watercolour and were completed between 1994 and 2001.[55] His last non-self-portrait dates 1997, and was of Patricia.[56] It was titled by Patrice Polini as Pat (Artist's Wife).[57]

Death

Utermohlen had retired from painting by December 2000,[58] and could no longer draw by 2002. In 2004, he was in the care of the Princess Louise nursing home.[10] He died at the Hammersmith Hospital on March 21, 2007, as a result of pneumonia at the age of 73.[19] Patricia said that "really he was dead long before that, Bill died in 2000, when the disease meant he was no longer able to draw."[59]

Later work

Self-portraits

On the creation of his self portraits

[Dementia] makes me anxious because I like to produce good work and I know good work, but it's just so sad when you feel you cannot do it... It was in sense of opportunity to have something so interesting to happen to you... You have to approach something like this positively and throw yourself into it... It's not fighting back, you can't fight it. But I wanted to understand what was happening to me in the only way I can.[60]

William Utermohlen, 2001 interview with Margaret Discroll

As onset of Alzheimer's began to affect his work, his self-portraits became increasingly abstract;[61] transforming into a series of "haunting psychological self-expressions."[62] The early stages of the disease had not impacted his ability to paint, despite what was observed in Crutch and his team's research.[63] Neurological illness was not hereditary in his family, and aside from a 1989 car accident which left him unconscious for around 30 minutes, Utermohlen's medical history was described by Crutch' as "unremarkable".[64]

Patricia said in a 2013 interview that she had to cover the mirrors in their house because he was terrified by what he saw there, and stopped using mirrors when painting his self-portraits.[65] Andrew Purcell of New Scientist noticed that, after Utermohlen's diagnosis, descriptions of his skull became a key aspect in the self-portraits.[66]

The later self-portraits are painted with thicker brushwork than in his earlier works.[67] Leslie Millin of Queen's Quarterly noted that they became more distorted but less colourful.[68] In Nicci Gerrard's 2019 book, What Dementia Teaches Us About Love, she describes the self-portraits as emotional modernism.[69] In Self Portrait (In The Studio) (1996), frustration and fear are evident in his expressions.[70] Xi Hsu claims that Utermohlen created this self portrait to express that he did not want to be known for his struggles with Alzheimer's, and wanted to be known as an artist.[71] His 1996 Self Portrait (With Easel),[lower-alpha 8] shows more confused emotions.[70] Polini describes the appearance of the easel in Self Portrait (With Easel) akin to prison bars.[74] A 1996 drawing, Broken Figure contains a ghost-like figure which serves as the outline of the fallen body in the drawing.[75] His Self Portrait with Saw (1997) has a serrated carpenter's saw in the far right,[76] which Patricia said references an autopsy that would have given a definite diagnosis for illness.[77] Polini noticed that the saw is vertically pointed, similar to a guillotine blade, and stated that it symbolises the "approach of a prefigured death".[78][lower-alpha 9] The last self portrait that Utermohlen used a mirror for,[80] Self Portrait (With Easel) (1998) uses the same pose as a 1955 self portrait. Polini explains that this was the artist's desire to "experience again the old motions of painting."[81]

Erased Self Portrait (1999) was Utermohlen's last attempt at a self-portrait using a paint brush.[82] It took him nearly two years to complete,[83] and was described by the BBC as "almost sponge like and empty".[84] Head I[lower-alpha 10] (2000) shows a head portraying eyes, mouth, and a smudge on the left that appears to be an ear;[54] a crack appearing in the centre of the head.[86] The rest of the portraits are of a blank head, one of them erased.[54] Associated Press' Joann Loviglio describes Utermohlen's final self-portraits as the "afterimages of a creative and talented spirit whose indentity appears to have vanished."[87]

Influences

Utermohlen's 1996 portrait Self Portrait (In The Studio) (left) was inspired by Francis Bacon's Study after Velázquez's Portrait of Pope Innocent X (1953)

Patricia describes these works as influenced by German Expressionism, and compares them to artists such as Ernst Ludwig Kirchner and Emil Nolde.[88] She explained in New Statesman: "It's odd, because he hardly ever thought of his German ancestry, but toward the end he becomes a kind of German abstract expressionist. He might have been quite amused by that, I think."[89]

Shortly after his diagnosis, he and Patricia travelled to Europe and saw Diego Velázquez's 1650 Portrait of Pope Innocent X,[90] which lead to an interest in Francis Bacon's distorted 1953 version Study after Velázquez's Portrait of Pope Innocent X.[91] After they returned to England in 1996, he created Self Portrait (In the Studio), which includes the screaming mouth, motif borrowed from Bacon's work.[92]

Legacy

Utermohlen's self-portraits gained attention after they were analysed in The Lancet's 2001 case report, which has often been attributed for advancing the work's popularity.[93][lower-alpha 11] According to Xi Hsu, the portraits have been marked as the "highlight of his career."[95]

Commenters have likened Utermohlen's works to those of Vincent van Gogh, Pablo Picasso, and Edvard Munch.[96] Some writers have also likened the self-portraits to the illustrations of Mervyn Peake;[97] although Demetrios J. Sahlas of Peake Studies noted that Peake's works were different to Utermohlen's, because shown in the works is the "preservation of insight".[98] A 2013 The Lancet article compared the self-portraits to those created by Rembrandt; describing that they detail Utermohlen "struggling to preserve his self against age", while also fighting against AD's "inexorable neurodegeneration".[99] Giovanni Frazzetto described Utermohlen's self-portraits as similar to the works of Egon Schiele, explaining that the portraits were "evocative of theshrivelled bodies and diaphanous faces" shown in the latter's work.[100]

Purcell stated that Utermohlen's artwork provided viewers with a "unique glimpse into the effects of a declining brain."[101] Researchers at Illinois Wesleyan University state that Utermohlen's self portraits show that "people with AD can have a strong voice through images."[102] The existence of his earlier self-portraits (which allowed viewers to create a time-lapse of his mental decline) and the idea that his works give a rare view into the mind of an Alzheimer's patient were two aspects contributing to his growing popularity.[103] The 2019 short film Mémorable was inspired by the self-portraits and nominated for the Academy Award for Best Animated Short Film in 2020.[104][105]

Exhibitions

Utermohlen had exhibited his early works long before his diagnosis. His paintings were exhibited at the Lee Nordness Gallery in 1968 and the Marlborough Gallery in 1969; in 1972, the Mummers cycle was displayed in Amsterdam.[14] Utermohlen's posthumous portrait of Gerald Penny was featured in the Gerald Penny 77' Center;[106] earlier that year, he had artworks such as Five Figures in the Mead Art Museum.[107] At their peak, sales of Utermohlen's earlier works ranged from $3,000 to $30,000.[108]

Utermohlen's artwork and his late self-portraits have also been shown in several exhibitions in the years after his death, including 12 exhibitions from 2006 to 2008.[109] In 2016, the exhibition A Persistence of Memory was shown at the Loyola University Museum of Art in Chicago.[110] The exhibition, which contained 100 artworks showing the effect of Alzheimer's on Utermohlen's work, was organised by Pamela Ambrose,[111] who said about his portraits: "If you did not know that this man was suffering from Alzheimer's, you could simply perceive the work as a stylistic change."[112]

Other notable exhibitions include a retrospective at the GV Art gallery in London in 2012,[113][lower-alpha 12] an exhibition at the Chicago Cultural Center in 2008 sponsored by Myriad Pharmaceuticals,[115][116] and The Later Works of William Utermohlen, shown at the New York Academy of Medicine in 2006, which marked the centenary of Alois Alzheimer first discovering the disease;[117] and was also open free to the public.[118] His self-portraits have also been shown in Washington, D.C. in 2007,[119] the Two 10 Gallery in London in 2001,[120] Harvard University at Cambridge, Massachusetts in 2005,[121] Boston, and Los Angeles. The self-portraits were exhibited in Sacramento, California in 2008.[122] Utermohlen's artworks were also shown in 2016 at the Kunstmuseum Thun in Switzerland.[123] In February 2007, a month before Utermohlen's death, his self-portraits were exhibited at Wilkes University.[124]

See also

References

Notes

  1. Sources conflict over the date of Utermohlen and Redmond's marriage: for example, NBC and New Statesman claims that they married the same year they met.[13]
  2. He was able to travel through Europe through the G.I. Bill, which he gained from his additional service in the Vietnam War.[6]
  3. According to Margaret Lock, Utermohlen was also influenced by Kitaj's pop art works.[10]
  4. In Utermohlen's last year at Massachussets, he was an artist-in-residence.[16]
  5. Although his earliest Nudes work date to 1953, he produced most of the works between 1973 and 1974.[23]
  6. According to Polini, he was also diagnosed in November of that year.[42]
  7. According to NBC, the painting was made between 1994–1995.[44]
  8. Also titled Self Portrait I[72] and Self Portrait (With Easel–Yellow and Green)[73]
  9. Polini also notes the guillotine theme in Self Portrait (With Easel), comparing the red and yellow lines in the portrait to the shape of a guillotine.[79]
  10. also titled just Head,[85] or Self-portrait[55]
  11. Utermohlen had wanted his works to be a subject of medical research. He willingly engaged in research published by The Lancet, which involved the relationship between the symptoms of the disease and the aesthetics of his work.[94]
  12. The GV Art gallery had a previous exhibition of Utermohlen's work earlier that year, which was titled William Utermohlen: Artistic Decline Through Alzheimer's.[114]

Citations

  1. UK Government.
  2. The Times 2007; Davenhill 2018, p. 318.
  3. The Wall Street Journal 2012; Utermohlen, Polini & Boicos 2008, p. 5; Lock 2015, p. 244.
  4. Utermohlen, Polini & Boicos 2008, p. 5.
  5. NBC 2006.
  6. Baldwin & Capstick 2007, p. xxix.
  7. The Wall Street Journal 2012.
  8. Bradley et al. 2006, p. 152.
  9. Utermohlen, Polini & Boicos 2008, p. 5; The Times 2007.
  10. Lock 2015, p. 245.
  11. The Times 2007.
  12. The Wall Street Journal 2012; Utermohlen, Polini & Boicos 2008, p. 5.
  13. NBC 2006; Adams 2012.
  14. Utermohlen, Polini & Boicos 2008, p. 6.
  15. Utermohlen, Polini & Boicos 2008, pp. 6–7; NBC 2006.
  16. The Times 2007, para. 7.
  17. Utermohlen, Polini & Boicos 2008, p. 7; The Wall Street Journal 2012.
  18. The Times 2007, para. 2.
  19. Utermohlen, Polini & Boicos 2008, p. 7.
  20. The Times 2007; NBC 2006; Tulle 2004, p. 105.
  21. Schutte & Stubenrauch 2006, p. 42.
  22. Utermohlen, Polini & Boicos 2008, pp. 7–8.
  23. Utermohlen 2006j.
  24. Gerlin 2001, para. 23.
  25. Utermohlen 2006g.
  26. Utermohlen 2006c.
  27. Utermohlen, Polini & Boicos 2008, p. 8.
  28. Hsu 2014, p. 114.
  29. Gerlin 2001, para. 20.
  30. Utermohlen, Polini & Boicos 2008, p. 12.
  31. Davenhill 2018, p. 307.
  32. Davenhill 2018, p. 305.
  33. Hsu 2014, pp. 117–118.
  34. Davenhill 2018, p. 301.
  35. Polini 2006, p. 4.
  36. Cook-Deegan 2018, pp. 64–65.
  37. Mackowiak 2018, p. 144.
  38. Gerlin 2001, para. 13-14.
  39. van Buren et al. 2013, p. 2.
  40. Soricelli 2006; Utermohlen, Polini & Boicos 2008, p. 24.
  41. Grady 2006.
  42. Davenhill 2018, p. 299.
  43. Schutte & Stubenrauch 2006, p. 42-43; Green et al. 2015, p. 17.
  44. NBC 2006, para. 6.
  45. Ball 2017.
  46. Polini 2006, p. 5; Davenhill 2018, p. 310.
  47. Adams 2012; The Wall Street Journal 2012.
  48. Hsu 2014, pp. 112–113.
  49. Gilhooly & Gilhooly 2021, p. 116; Davenhill 2018, p. 300.
  50. Davenhill 2018, p. 307; Gerlin 2001.
  51. Gerlin 2001, para. 25.
  52. Hsu 2014, p. 116.
  53. Davenhill 2018, p. 300.
  54. Boicos 2016.
  55. Davenhill 2018, p. 317.
  56. Utermohlen, Polini & Boicos 2008, p. 25.
  57. Polini 2006, p. 9.
  58. Derbyshire 2001; BBC 2001b.
  59. Purcell 2012, para. 1.
  60. Hsu 2014, p. 123.
  61. Gerrard 2015; Ingram 2003, p. 312.
  62. Chatterjee 2015, p. 487.
  63. Hsu 2014, pp. 111–112.
  64. Crutch, Isaacs & Rossor 2001, p. 2129.
  65. Hsu 2014, p. 121.
  66. Purcell 2012, para. 5.
  67. Crutch, Isaacs & Rossor 2001, p. 2130.
  68. Millin 2007, para. 3.
  69. Hale 2019, para. 7.
  70. Green et al. 2015, p. 11.
  71. Hsu 2014, p. 129.
  72. Davenhill 2018, p. 311; NBC 2006.
  73. Schutte & Stubenrauch 2006, p. 41.
  74. Polini 2006, p. 6; Davenhill 2018, p. 312.
  75. Polini 2006, p. 6.
  76. Frei, Alvarez & Alexander 2010, p. 675.
  77. Neurology Today 2006; Hall 2012, p. 54.
  78. Polini 2006, p. 9; Hsu 2014, p. 118.
  79. Davenhill 2018, p. 339.
  80. Polini 2006, p. 11.
  81. Davenhill 2018, p. 315.
  82. NBC 2006; Utermohlen, Polini & Boicos 2008, p. 25.
  83. Soricelli 2006.
  84. BBC 2001b.
  85. Schutte & Stubenrauch 2006, p. 43.
  86. Utermohlen, Polini & Boicos 2008, p. 25; Dublin Science Gallery 2016.
  87. Basting 2009, p. 126.
  88. Utermohlen, Polini & Boicos 2008, p. 24.
  89. Adams 2012, para. 9.
  90. Hsu 2014, p. 126.
  91. Adams 2012.
  92. Hsu 2014, p. 127.
  93. The Wall Street Journal 2012; Utermohlen, Polini & Boicos 2008, p. 7; Tulle 2004, p. 107.
  94. Swinnen 2015, p. 147.
  95. Hsu 2014, p. 111.
  96. Swinnen 2015, p. 145.
  97. Forsythe, Williams & Reilly 2017, p. 2.
  98. Sahlas 2003, p. 10.
  99. Matthews & Matthews 2015, p. 986.
  100. Frazzetto 2016, p. 347.
  101. Purcell 2012, para. 11.
  102. Green et al. 2015, p. 17.
  103. Swinnen 2015, pp. 145–146.
  104. Grobar 2020; McLean 2020.
  105. Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences 2020.
  106. Jackson & Blair 1974, p. 1.
  107. Iacobuzio 1974, p. 18.
  108. Gerlin 2001, para. 6.
  109. Utermohlen, Polini & Boicos 2008, p. 35.
  110. Thometz 2016.
  111. Stennett 2016, para. 2.
  112. Politis 2016, para. 3.
  113. The Wall Street Journal 2012; Adams 2012.
  114. Purcell 2012, para. 2.
  115. Lock 2015, p. 244.
  116. Swinnen 2015, p. 147, n. 4.
  117. Neurology Today 2006; NBC 2006; Grady 2006.
  118. Polini 2006, p. 2.
  119. Molinsky 2007, 8:08-8:18.
  120. BBC 2001a; Crutch, Isaacs & Rossor 2001, p. 2133.
  121. Sharp 2017, para. 5; Harvard Art Museums 2005, p. 34.
  122. Trinity Journal 2008.
  123. Sharp 2017, para. 5.
  124. Biebel 2007.

Sources

Journals

  • Cook-Deegan, Robert (2018). "Progress Against Alzheimer's Disease?". Issues in Science and Technology. 35 (1). JSTOR 26594289.
  • Crutch, Sebastian J.; Isaacs, Ron; Rossor, Martin N. (30 June 2001). "Some workmen can blame their tools: artistic change in an individual with Alzheimer's disease". The Lancet. 357 (9274): 2129–33. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)05187-4. PMID 11445128.
  • Forsythe, Alex; Williams, Tasmin; Reilly, Ronan G. (January 2017). "What Paint Can Tell Us". Neuropsychology. American Psychological Association. 31 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1037/neu0000303.
  • Frei, Judith; Alvarez, Sarah E.; Alexander, Michelle B. (December 2010). "Ways of Seeing: Using the Visual Arts in Nursing Education". Journal of Nursing Education. 49 (12): 672–676. doi:10.3928/01484834-20100831-04.
  • Frazzetto, Giovanni (22 January 2016). "The damage we do". Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science. 351 (6271): 347. doi:10.1126/science.aad9278.
  • "Annual Report (Harvard University Art Museums) No. 2005/2006". Harvard Art Museums. The President and Fellows of Harvard College. 2005. JSTOR 4301690.
  • Hall, Stephen S. (1 November 2012). "The Dementia Plague". MIT Technology Review. 115 (6): 50–58. ISSN 2749-649X.
  • Ingram, Vernon (July–August 2003). "Alzheimer's Disease: The molecualr origins of the disease are coming to light, suggesting several novel therapies". American Scientist. Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Honor Society. 91 (4): 312–321. JSTOR 27858242.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)
  • Matthews, Paul M.; Matthews, Emily A. (23 March 2015). "Expanding perception through the disordered brain". The Lancet. 381 (9871): 985–986. ISSN 0140-6736.
  • Sahlas, Demetrios J. (November 2003). "Diagnosing Mervyn Peake's Neurological Condition". Peake Studies. G. Peter Winnington. 8 (3): 4–20. JSTOR 24776099.
  • Schutte, Debra L.; Stubenrauch, James (December 2006). "CE Credit: Alzheimer Disease and Genetics: Anticipating the Questions". The American Journal of Nursing. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 106 (12). JSTOR 29744851.
  • van Buren, Benjamin; Bromberger, Bianca; Potts, Daniel; Miller, Bruce; Chatterjee, Anjan (February 2013). "Changes in Painting Styles of Two Artists With Alzheimer's Disease". Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Educational Publishing Foundation. 7 (1). doi:10.1037/a0029332.

Bibliography

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.