Penal populism

Penal populism is a form of governance where lawmakers choose criminal penalties by their popularity among voters, rather than by their effectiveness for dealing with crime and social problems.[1] The phrase was coined in 1993 by Anthony Bottoms,[2] when he labeled it one of the four main influences on contemporary criminal justice.[3] It has been theorized that the rise of penal populism has brought an increase in the repressiveness of various nation's criminal laws, including that of the UK,[4] Canada under Prime Minister Stephen Harper,[5] and the United States during the War on Drugs.[6]

References

  1. MARGARITA DOBRYNINA (June 2017). "The Roots of "Penal Populism": the Role of Media and Politics". Kriminologijos Studijos.
  2. Karen Gelb (2014). Penal Populism, Sentencing Councils and Sentencing Policy. Routledge. p. 3. ISBN 9781317821847.
  3. John Pratt (2007). Penal Populism. Taylor & Francis. p. 2. ISBN 9781134173297.
  4. David A. Green (2012). When Children Kill Children: Penal Populism and Political Culture. Oxford University Press. p. 220. ISBN 978-0-19-162976-1.
  5. Kelly, James, & Kate Puddister. “Criminal Justice Policy during the Harper Era: Private Member’s Bills, Penal Populism, and the Criminal Code of Canada.” Canadian Journal of Law and Society / La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société 32, no. 3 (2017): 391-415. DOI: 10.1017/cls.2017.25
  6. Julian V. Roberts, Loretta J. Stalans, David Indermaur, Mike Hough (2002). Penal Populism and Public Opinion: Lessons from Five Countries. University of Oxford Press. p. 197. ISBN 978-0-19-028577-7.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.