Judiciary of South Korea

The judiciary of South Korea is judicial branch of South Korean central government, established by Chapter 5 and 6 of the Constitution of South Korea.[1]

Politics of the Republic of Korea
Government
Legislature
Executive
Judiciary
Elections
Political parties
Korean conflict
 South Korea portal

These two chapters describe judiciary of South Korea into two groups by jurisdiction of matters.[2][3] One is Constitutional Court which is highest court on adjudication of matters mainly on Constitutionality. Another is ordinary courts on matters except jurisdiction of Constitutional Court. These ordinary courts are shall have Supreme Court as their highest court. Chief Justice of Supreme court and President of Constitutional court are treated as two equivalent heads of judiciary branch in South Korea by article 15 of Constitutional Court Act.[4] Though, since relationship between Supreme Court and Constitutional Court is not thoroughly defined anywhere in Constitution of South Korea and other related statutes, these two highest court of South Korea have been struggling about jurisdiction against each other for long years.

Organizational traits

South Korean legal system is basically an civil law system mostly influenced by Germany and Japan, since modern legal system of Korea was transplanted by force during Japanese colonization of Korea in early 20th century. After liberation and Korean War, South Korean legal system was gradually influenced by common law system from United States. Following, contemporary South Korean legal system has both civil law and common law properties and this aspect is reflected also on judiciary organization of South Korea. For example, South Korea has two highest courts(Supreme Court and Constitutional Court) according to jurisdiction on constitutional cases, as civil law systems like France, Germany and Austria. However, South Korea has also adopted common law system properties since early 2010's, such as training new lawyers through 3-year law school with JD degree, and appointing judges among lawyers with substantial career.

Ordinary courts

Ordinary courts (Korean: 일반법원), usually called as just 'Courts' (Korean: 법원), of South Korea are established by Chapter 5 of Constitution of South Korea. All of ordinary courts are under the jurisdiction of the national judiciary; independent local courts are not permitted under Article 101(2) of Constitution. Statutory ground for hierarchy of ordinary courts is 'Court Organization Act[5]' of South Korea. Under article 3(1),28 and 28-4 of Court Organization Act, hierarchy of ordinary courts in South Korea has three levels; District Courts(plus family court, bankruptcy court, and administrative court, which are specialized courts on matters of family, bankruptcy and administration laws), High Courts(plus patent court which is specialized appellate court on matters of intellectual property, for reviewing ruling or decision made by the 'Intellectual Property Trial And Appeal Board[6]'[7]) and Supreme Court.

Supreme Court of Korea
South Korean Supreme Court building in Seocho, Seoul
Main article: Supreme Court of South Korea

The Supreme Court (Korean: 대법원), seated in Seocho-gu, Seoul, consists of fourteen Supreme Court Justices, including one Chief Justice. Chief Justice of Supreme Court is appointed by President of South Korea with the consent of the National Assembly, and has authority over administration of all ordinary courts. Other Justices are also appointed by President of South Korea with consent of National Assembly, though candidates for new Justice is recommended by Chief Justice. The Justices and Chief Justice must be at least 45 years old, and shall have at least 20 years of experience practicing law with license of attorney at law. They serve for six-year terms; the Chief Justice cannot be reappointed, but term of the other Justices are renewable under article 105(2) of constitution. However, none of Justices tried to renew his/her term after Sixth Republic since it could harm independence of judiciary by increasing influence of executive President. Justices and Chief Justice cannot be older than age 70.

Judges in Research division

Justices in Supreme Court are assisted by seconded Judges from sub-Supreme courts, and they are called 'Judges in Research division (Korean: 재판연구관)' or 'Research Judges'. This secondment is decided by Chief Justice of Supreme Court. Because under article 44 of Court Organization Act, the Chief Justice has power to transfer every single Judge from one of ordinary courts to any other ordinary courts in South Korea. Function of seconded Judges in Supreme Court is similar to Law clerks in ordinary courts. They serve about 2 years as judicial assistant for Justices, yet not all seconded Judges are not individually attached to one of Justice, as some of seconded Judges serve as research group or panel to assist decisions of whole Supreme Court.

National Court Administration

Administration affairs(including fiscal, personnel and human resource affairs) of all ordinary courts in South Korea is governed by institution called 'The National Court Administration (NCA, Korean: 법원행정처)', which is established in Supreme Court under article 19 of Court Organization Act.[8] Head of NCA is appointed by Chief Justice, and is appointed among Justices. Though this centralized power on Chief Justice can eventually harm independence of individual Judges and even Justices, NCA is also serves for judicial independence from other branches of government.

High Courts and District Courts

Below the Supreme Court come appellate courts which are called 'High Courts (Korean: 고등법원)', stationed in six of the country's major cities. High Courts typically consist of a panel of three judges. Below these are District Courts (Korean: 지방법원) and its Branch Courts (Korean: 지방법원 지원), which exist in most of the large cities of South Korea. Below these are Municipal Courts (Korean: 시·군법원), positioned all over the country and limited to small claims and petty offenses. Municipal courts usually do not have jurisdiction over criminal cases. 'Specialized courts (Korean: 전문법원, not to be confused with 'Special courts' under article 110(1) of Constitution)' also exist for family, administrative, bankruptcy and patent cases.

Judges

Judges (Korean: 판사) except Supreme Court Justices and Chief Justice, serving in ordinary courts are appointed by the Chief Justice with the consent of the Council of Supreme Court Justices. Judges serve for ten-year renewable terms, up to age of 65. After reform of ordinary courts in early 2010's, at least 10 years of experience practicing law with license of attorney at law is required for Judge.[9] Goal of reform was changing structure of ordinary courts as courts in common law system, such as United States, to reinforce independence of individual Judges and reduce bureaucratic influence of Chief Justice. This reform of courts in early 2010's includes abolishing advancement and promotion opportunities for Judges to become head of each High Court and District Court. Now in year 2022, heads of each High Court and District Court(which are called as 'Chief Judge' of each court) are mainly elected among and by Judges in each court, and appointed by Chief Justice in Supreme Court. Before this reform, all Judges were appointed just after finishing two-year training program in Judicial Research and Training Institute(JRTI), which selects its trainees who passed difficult test on matters of jurisprudence after LL.B. degree.

Judges in South Korea is highly protected from external political pressure under article 106(1) of constitution. No judge can be removed from office unless the judges is imprisoned as criminal punishment. However, It is noteworthy that Judges in South Korea can be refused from renewing its term, and can be transferred to different court against their will.

Judges in ordinary courts of South Korea are usually transferred to different courts all around South Korea per about two years by order of Chief Justice, under article 44 of Court Organization Act. This strong power of Chief Justice to change workplace of all Judges in ordinary courts(including Chief Judge of each court) per about every two year is legacy of bureaucratic customs in South Korean courts. Before year reform of courts in early 2010's, young Judges were appointed according to their graduation records of JTRI, such as test score and grades, then they were placed in each District Courts from Seoul to Jeju, according to their graduation records, again. This means, to be placed in or transferred to influential courts like Seoul Administrative Court, young Judges should try to fit themselves under strict assessment of senior Judges in National Court Administration under Chief Justice, which is an actual promotion and advancement among peer Judges. Later those Judges in leading group among peers who have achieved nice career route usually got officially promoted to Head of each District Court or presiding Judge at High Court. This two-year cycle transfer and promotion system for Judges enhanced efficiency of ordinary courts of South Korea greatly. For example, judicial performance of South Korea ranked in top-tier among OECD countries in year 2013.[10] High efficiency of courts contributed to protection of rights and reinforcement on rule of laws in South Korea. However, this bureaucratic hierarchy inside ordinary courts could harm independence of individual Judges and damage reliance of judiciary, which later provoked pressure to reform courts in 2010's.[11] However, this power to transfer Judges into other court regularly per two-year by Chief Justice is still valid in South Korea.

Judicial Assistant Officials

Judicial Assistant Officials (JAO, Korean: 사법보좌관) is an Judge-equivalent officer who has limited power to rule over several procedural matters under supervision of Judges. Following article 54 of Court Organization Act, JAO is appointed among court officials with 5 to 10 years of experience on procedural matters in court. Unless interested party raise objection on ruling of JAO, its ruling has equivalent power to ruling of Judge. When ruling of JAO is challenged with objection, supervising Judge should make decision whether or not to accept such objection. JAO system is mainly influenced by German judicial system, called Rechtspfleger.

Law Clerks

From year 2011, fresh J.D. graduates from Law school are selected as Law clerk (Korean: 재판연구원) to assist Judges in High courts and District courts for 2 to 3 years, under article 53-2 of Court Organization Act. Law clerks in South Korea is recruited by each of six High courts, though some of top-tier graduates are appointed as 'Judicial Researcher' at the Supreme Court, which is basically a law clerk for Supreme Court Justices. It is noteworthy that Law clerks in South Korea are not recruited by individual Judges and Supreme Court Justices.

Military courts

Under article 110(1) of the Constitution and 'Military Court Act',[12] Military Court (Korean: 군사법원, or Courts-martial) is established permanently in both peacetime and wartime as 'Special court (Korean: 특별법원, or Extraordinary Court)' in each South Korean armed forces. As Military Courts are not established inside Court Organization Act's boundary, these Courts are regarded as out side of conventional judicial hierarchy made of ordinary courts. The Military Courts rule over criminal cases when the accused is member of armed forces, and they are composed of Military Judges (Korean: 군판사) constituted of Judge advocates (Korean: 군법무관) appointed by generals in South Korean armed forces. South Korean Judge advocates are military officers qualified as attorney at law in South Korea, yet not Judges in ordinary courts. However, final appellate jurisdiction of this military-criminal cases still falls under jurisdiction of Supreme Court of South Korea according to article 110(2) of the Constitution.

Constitutional court
South Korean Constitutional Court building in Jongno, Seoul
Main article: Constitutional Court of Korea

The Constitutional Court (Korean: 헌법재판소), seated in Jongno-gu, Seoul and independent from the Supreme Court, is only and highest court on matters of adjudication on Constitutionality including Judicial review, Constitutional review on competence dispute, Constitutional complaint, plus deciding cases of impeachment and cases of dissolution of unconstitutional political parties.[13] Other judicial matters are overseen by the ordinary courts. This system was newly established in the Sixth Republic, to reinforce protection on fundamental rights and democracy against rise of authoritarian government. The Constitutional Court consists of nine Justices. Of these Justices, three are recommended by the Chief Justice of the Supreme court, three by the National Assembly, and three by the President of South Korea; however, all must be appointed by the President of South Korea. The President of the Constitutional Court, which is chief of Justices in the Constitutional Court, is appointed among Constitutional Court Justices by the President of South Korea with consent of the National Assembly. The Justices of Constitutional court, including President of Constitutional Court serve for six-year terms, and cannot be older than age 70. Justices except President of Constitutional court can renew its term, though none of Justices ever tried to renew his/her term, as Justices in Supreme court refused its reappointment since it could harm independence of judiciary. Detailed organization and procedure of the Constitutional Court is defined under 'Constitutional Court Act[4]'

Rapporteur Judges

Under article 19 of Constitutional Court Act, Rapporteur Judges (Korean: 헌법연구관) are appointed by President of the Constitutional Court of Korea. They serve as judicial assistant for Justices in Constitutional Court.[14] Rapporteur Judges serve for ten-year renewable terms up to age of 60 and paid as same as Judges in ordinary courts. It is noticeable that Rapporteur Judges serve longer than Justices in Constitutional Court, while Research Judges serve shorter than Justices in Supreme Court. This professional assistant office is designed to ensure continuity of constitutional adjudication in South Korea. Yet some of Rapporteur Judges office is filled by seconded Judges from ordinary courts, and seconded government officials including Prosecutors. These seconded Judges and Prosecutors serve for 1 to 2 years as Rapporteur Judges.

Department of Court Administration

Under article 17 of Constitutional Court Act, Department of Court Administration (DCA, Korean: 헌법재판소사무처) is established in Constitutional Court. Head of department is called as 'Secretary General', and is appointed by President of Constitutional Court. As NCA of Supreme Court, Department of Court Administration deals with every matters on court administration including fiscal, personnel and human resource affairs. Yet while head of NCA is appointed among Justices in Supreme Court, Secretary General is not appointed among Justices in Constitutional Court.

Separation of powers inside Judicial branch

The current Constitution of South Korea distributes power of judicial review inside judiciary between ordianary courts in Chapter 5 and constitutional court in Chapter 6. Under article 107(2) in Chapter 5, the ordinary courts including the Supreme Court have ultimate jurisdiction over reviewing constitutionality of sub-statutory decrees, regulations or actions made by administrative level. Under article 111(1) in Chapter 6, the Constitutional Court have ulitimate jurisdiction over reviewing constitutionality of sub-constitutional statutes made by legislature level, even without request from the ordinary courts through article 68(2) of the Consitutional Court Act. In this structure of power separation, ordinary courts and the constitutional court can practically contend over each other's ruling. Yet the Constitution does not clarify who should arbitrate when the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court struggles against each other.

One of major power struggle issue between two highest courts is constitutional complaint over judgment of ordinary court (Korean: 재판소원, German: Urteilsverfassungsbeschwerde). As in Austria, constitutional complaint on ordinary court's judgment is strictly forbidden according to article 68(1) of Constitutional Court Act. However, the Constitutional Court adjudicates that such article of the Act is lacks constitutionality, unless it is interpreted as constitutional complaint over judgment of ordinary court should be exceptionally allowed when the judgement applicated unconstitutional statute which is already officially nullified before the judgment by judicial review of the Constitutional Court.[15]

This kind of judicial review ruling in the Constitutional Court of Korea is called 'conditionally unconstitutional (Korean: 한정위헌)', which is actually an declaration that statute under judicial review is currently constitutional, yet the statute must be interpreted in specific way which is aligned to constitutional order interpreted by the Constitutional Court, thus all ordinary courts including the Supreme Court of South Korea should be bound by such interpretation on statute of the Constitutional Court. The concept of such ruling is attempt of the Constitutional Court of Korea to adopt unrivaled status of German constitutional court, where constitutional court can suggest binding interpretation on statute to other highest ordinary courts of Germany, which is called 'constitutional interpretation of statute (German: verfassungskonforme Auslegung)'. The German constitutional court can also adjudicate constitutional complaint over judgment of ordinary court, functioning as actual cassation, which led the constitutional court to very summit of constitutional system.[16]

The Supreme Court of Korea opposes the Constitutional Court of Korea on both binding power of 'conditionally unconstitutional' ruling and possibility of constitutional complaint over judgment of ordinary court, since it could turn equivalent status of Supreme Court against the Constitutional Court into substantially inferior status as German federal ordinary courts against German federal constitutional court. However, whether the Constitutional Court of Korea can exercise power of suggesting binding interpretation not only on the Constitution but also on statute (by conditional ruling), or can review unconstitutionality of ordinary court judgment (by constitution complaint procedure) still remains unsolved, since the Constitution and even associated statutes never clarify how this struggle should be settled.[17]

Criticism
  • South Korea's judiciary is often criticized for being overly lenient toward criminals. For example, in the Cho Doo-soon Case involving the brutal rape of an eight-year old girl, the 56 year old male rapist was sentenced to only 12 years in prison.
  • According to OECD study in 2015, South Korean's confidence on judicial system is dropping rapidly from 2010's.[18] It is notable that confidence level on judicial branch is lower than executive branches of South Korean government.

See also

Notes and References
  1. "CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA". Korea Legislation Research Institute. Retrieved 2022-02-26.
  2. "South Korea, The National Law Review". Retrieved 2022-04-15.
  3. "Constitutional history of Republic of Korea, ConstitutionNet". Retrieved 2022-04-15.
  4. "CONSTITUTIONAL COURT ACT". Korea Legislation Research Institute. Retrieved 2022-02-26.
  5. "COURT ORGANIZATION ACT". Korea Legislation Research Institute. Retrieved 2022-02-23.
  6. "KIPO english website". Korean Intellectual Property Office. Retrieved 2022-02-26.
  7. "Jurisdiction of Patent court of Korea". Patent Court of Korea. Retrieved 2022-02-26.
  8. "Organizational Chart of Supreme Court of Korea". SUPREME COURT OF KOREA. Retrieved 2022-02-28.
  9. However, since this reform was too sudden for whole ordinary courts in South Korea, required experience for Judge before year 2029 is 3 to 7 years according to addenda of amended Court Organization Act in year 2011 and 2021. See "Judges qualifications". Supreme Court of Korea. Retrieved 2019-01-01. updated in 2019 and amended addenda of Court Organization Act in 2021-12-21
  10. "Judicial performance and its determinants: a cross-country perspective". OECD. Retrieved 2022-02-26.
  11. "An influence-peddling scandal ensnares South Korea's top court". The Economist. 2019-01-24. Retrieved 2022-04-07.
  12. "MILITARY COURT ACT". Korea Legislation Research Institute. Retrieved 2022-02-26.
  13. "Jurisdiction of Constitutional Court of Korea". Constitutional Court of Korea. Retrieved 2022-02-26.
  14. "Organization of Constitutional Court". Constitutional Court of Korea. Retrieved 2022-02-26.
  15. "96Hun-Ma172 (Decision date : Dec 24, 1997)". Constitutional Court of Korea. Retrieved 2022-04-07.
  16. See Lech Garlicki, Constitutional courts versus supreme courts, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2007, Pages 44–68. Available at "International Journal of Constitutional Law". Oxford Academic. Retrieved 2022-04-07.
  17. See Jibong Lim, Korean Constitutional Court Standing at the Crossroads: Focusing on Real Cases and Variational Types of Decisions, 24 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 327 (2002). Available at "Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review". Loyola Law School. Retrieved 2022-02-26.
  18. "Trust in government in Korea: A puzzle". OECD. Retrieved 2022-02-26.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.