Dead cat strategy
In politics, a dead cat strategy (or deadcatting) is the deliberate introduction of a shocking story to divert media discourse away from problems or failures in other areas.[1] The metaphor used is thought to be associated with Australian political strategist Lynton Crosby.
Etymology
In his column in The Telegraph on 3 March 2013, Boris Johnson, then the mayor of London, explained the term "dead cat" as a piece of Australian political analysis, describing a strategy to be employed in a situation where an argument is being lost and "the facts are overwhelmingly against you":[2][3]
There is one thing that is absolutely certain about throwing a dead cat on the dining room table – and I don’t mean that people will be outraged, alarmed, disgusted. That is true, but irrelevant. The key point, says my Australian friend, is that everyone will shout, ‘Jeez, mate, there’s a dead cat on the table!’ In other words, they will be talking about the dead cat – the thing you want them to talk about – and they will not be talking about the issue that has been causing you so much grief.[4]
Johnson employed Lynton Crosby as his London mayoral election campaign manager during the 2008 and 2012 London mayoral elections, and the press speculated that he was the "Australian friend" in the story.[5][3]
Some observe that dead cat strategy is used, not only to distract when an argument is being lost; but also to avoid responsibility or the repercussions of misconduct.[6][7][8] Because 'dead cats' are by defintion extreme or outlandish,[9] some claim that the dead cat strategy is unsustainable,[10] others argue it can overcome 'intellectual laziness' and win elections.[11]
See also
- Chewbacca defense – Nonsensical diversionary legal defense strategy
- Diversionary foreign policy – Conflict instigated to distract from domestic strife
- Fearmongering – Deliberate use of fear-based tactics
- Post-truth politics – Political culture where facts are considered of low relevance
- Propaganda techniques – Methods of mind manipulation, many of which are based on logical fallacies
- Rally 'round the flag effect
- Red herring – Fallacious approach developed as a diversion to mislead the audience
- Wag the Dog – 1997 film by Barry Levinson
- Whataboutism – Formal fallacy
References
- Riley, Charlotte Lydia (19 November 2019). "Dear journalists: please stop calling everything a "dead cat"". Prospect Magazine. Retrieved 30 April 2022.
- Johnson, Boris (3 March 2013). "This cap on bankers' bonuses is like a dead cat – pure distraction". The Telegraph.
- Smith, David (16 June 2019). "Boris Johnson's dead cat tactics on tax and a no‑deal Brexit". The Times.
- Delaney, Sam. "How Lynton Crosby (and a dead cat) won the election: 'Labour were intellectually lazy'". The Guardian. Retrieved 14 March 2017.
- Syal, Rajeev (2 Feb 2022). "Why is Boris Johnson making false claims about Starmer and Savile?". The Guardian.
- "Boris Johnson's Rwanda migrant announcement is a lazy diversion tactic at best". the Independent. 14 April 2022. Retrieved 1 May 2022.
- "Boris Johnson bets on a 'dead cat' strategy to get him out of trouble". The Week. 23 April 2021. Retrieved 1 May 2022.
- "Is Boris Johnson using 'dead cat' strategy in latest Dominic Cummings row?". the Independent. 14 April 2022. Retrieved 1 May 2022.(subscription required)
- Blumer, J. G. (31 January 2018). "The Crisis of Public Communication". Javnost - The Public Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture. 23: 87–108. doi:10.1080/13183222.2018.1418799.
- "Boris Johnson is a master of distraction. What if that stops working?". The Washington Post. 15 April 2022. Retrieved 1 May 2022.
- "How Lynton Crosby (and a dead cat) won the election: 'Labour were intellectually lazy'". the Guardian. 20 Jan 2016. Retrieved 1 May 2022.