1997 Bojnurd earthquake

The 1997 Bojnurd earthquake occurred on February 4 at 14:07 IRST, near the Turkmenistan-Iran border region. The epicenter of the Mw 6.5 earthquake was the Kopet Dag mountains of North Khorasan province.[4] With a maximum Modified Mercalli intensity of VIII (Severe), the event resulted in at least 88 fatalities, 1,948 injuries, and severe damage in the cities of Shirvan and Bojnord.[5] At least 173 villages were affected; three were destroyed. The total cost of damage was estimated at $US 30 million.

1997 Bojnurd earthquake
Tehran
UTC time1997-02-04 10:37:47
ISC event1009575
USGS-ANSSComCat
Local dateFebruary 4, 1997 (1997-02-04)
Local time14:07 IRST
Duration5 seconds
Magnitude6.5 Mw [1]
Depth8 km (5 mi)
Epicenter37.68°N 57.27°E / 37.68; 57.27 [1]
TypeStrike-slip[2]
Areas affectedIran, Turkmenistan
Total damage$US 30 million
Max. intensityVIII (Severe)
Peak acceleration0.3 g
ForeshocksMw 5.4
AftershocksMany, largest is Mw 5.2 [3]
Casualties88–100 dead, 1,948 injured

Tectonic setting

The Kopet Dag mountains that form the border of Iran and Turkmenistan is part of the Alpine orogeny; a mountain-building event. The mountain range formed as a result of a continental collision between the Iranian and Eurasian Plates. This collision zone formed following of the closure of the Tethys Sea between the Iranian and Arabian Plates. The Iranian Plate was pushed into the Turan Platform of the Eurasian Plate after its collision with the Arabian Plate. The collision with the Turan Platform, in turn, formed the Kopet Dag mountains. Crustal deformation is accommodated by a fold and thrust belt beneath the range. Seismicity in the northwestern part of the range corresponds to shallow thrust and some sinistral strike-slip faulting. The eastern part of the range is dominated by dextral strike-slip faulting. Shallow strike-slip faults in the eastern part of the range have resulted in horizontal offsets of the mountain range.[6]

Earthquake

The region of northeastern Iran is rich in historical records of earthquakes due to its geographical importance in trade between Europe and Asia. Earthquakes in ther region have been recorded for over 2000 years. Among the most damaging were the earthquakes at nearby Quchan in 1851, 1871–72, 1893, and 1895. In the 20th century, two earthquakes in 1929 and 1948 caused many fatalities as well. Seismicity is restricted to the shallow continental crust no deeper than 15 km. These earthquakes are associated with activity on the Bakharden–Quchan Fault Zone; a system of north northwest–south southeast trending strike-slip faults between Bojnord and Quchan.[7]

The earthquake struck at a shallow depth of 8 km (5 mi). By analyzing teleseismic body-waveform, as well as field observation of the earthquake's effects, it was concluded that a 15-km-long strike-slip fault trending northwest–southeast ruptured. Based on the distribution of aftershocks, the fault is oriented in a north-northwest–south-southeast strike, and slightly concave to the east. A rupture initiated in the north, and propagated south along the strike for five seconds, causing unusually great devastation to areas in the southeast of the epicenter. This was attributed to the directivity of seismic energy to the southeast, which was in the direction of rupture. The fault caused an average displacement of 0.5–1.0 meter along the 15 km rupture. Some instances of en echelon surface ruptures were observed at the epicenter region. This style and orientation of faulting is consistent with past earthquakes in the region. The mainshock was preceded by a foreshock of Mw 5.4 at 13:23 IRST.[8]

Casualties

Although the earthquake resulted in a significant death toll of at least 88, it was greatly reduced by the occurrence of a foreshock one hour earlier. Many residents were already alerted to the possibility of a larger event. At the timing of the mainshock, many residents in the affected area were working outdoors.[8]

Initial reports stated that 38 people were killed and 90 were injured in the city of Bojnord alone, according to the Iranian state media.[9] The following day, the death toll in Bojnurd and Shirvan rose to 72, and about 200 were injured.[10] By April 20, the death toll stood at 82 in Bojnurd and six in Shirvan. At least 498 people were seriously injured and needed hospitalization. A further 1,450 had minor injuries.[11]

Impact

Based on the extent of damage, a maximum Mercalli intensity of VIII was assigned around a 10-km radius of the epicenter. Serious damage was reported in over 173 villages. Most of the damage was attributed to poor construction of adobe homes on steep slopes. One village in the meizoseismal area suffered the complete loss of all adobe-constructed homes; only two reinforced concrete buildings survived but with significant damage.[5] At least three villages; Naveh, Ghezel Ghan and Sheikh were completely destroyed.[12] A total of 5,500 homes collapsed and 11,000 were damaged.[13] The total cost of damage was estimated to be greater than $US 30 million.[11]

The destruction and serious damage to single-storey structures were evidence of high frequency seismic energy released during the rupture. A maximum peak ground acceleration (pga) of 0.3 g was estimated in the meizoseismal area. Violent ground motion was recounted by survivors, causing total damage to buildings.[8] The city of Bojnurd experienced a pga of 0.2 g, causing some damage. While there were no reported collapses in buildings, many were severely cracked and structurally compromised. A petrochemical plant located 15 km from the epicenter had minor damage, causing operations to cease for several days.[5] Many landslides and slope failures were reported.

Aftermath

The Iranian Ministry of Interior (Iran) helped organize emergency and relief works. Relief workers from multiple agencies, including the state government, Islamic Republic of Iran Armed Forces, and Red Crescent Society of Iran were involved in providing aid to the affected communities. Items such as tents, lanterns, clothings, food and sanitary products were mobilized. The Government of Iran also stated that international assistance would be welcomed and handled domestically.[11]

Rumors about the potential for another large earthquake began spreading, causing panic. When the International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology was asked if there would be a larger event in the region, Mohammad Tartar, the Vice-president of research and technology, said that it was a difficult question to answer. Tartar added that further studies were required to understand the geophysical effects the earthquake had on nearby faults. There is the possibility that another fault might rupture and cause an earthquake in the next few years. However, the chances of a larger earthquake measuring 6.5 immediately following the February 4 event are rare. He also said that strong aftershocks were possible and that humanitarian agencies should be wary.[14]

See also

References

Sources

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.